<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Standing on the Side of Love with a Broken Heart</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.standingonthesideoflove.org/blog/standing-on-the-side-of-love-with-a-broken-heart/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.standingonthesideoflove.org/blog/standing-on-the-side-of-love-with-a-broken-heart/</link>
	<description>Stories of Harnessing Love&#039;s Power to Stop Oppression</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 22:31:34 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sean Fischer</title>
		<link>http://www.standingonthesideoflove.org/blog/standing-on-the-side-of-love-with-a-broken-heart/comment-page-1/#comment-355</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Fischer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 17:50:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.standingonthesideoflove.org/?p=1854#comment-355</guid>
		<description>&quot;Andrew Fink says: As much as we dislike the result, we should respect that it is a product of the democratic process we commit to. The democratic process includes results we disagree with.&quot;

Hi Andrew,

Under most circumstances, I would agree with you. A &quot;majority wins&quot; approach, on the whole, promotes freedom. However, the democratic process is inappropriate when it is used to restrict the freedoms of a specific group of people. Think of it this way- would you support putting the freedoms of ethnic and racial minorities up to a popular vote? Would you be comfortable with putting the rights of women up to a popular vote? Hypothetically, what if the majority voted in favor of oppressing those groups or others? Our 5th principle is meant to promote freedom, not restrict it. 

Taking away the rights of a specific group of people (including through a popular vote) solely based on their identity runs counter to our 1st, 2nd, and 6th principles. At its heart, our faith seeks justice and freedom for everyone. Putting the rights of minorities, including LGBT people, up to a popular vote is always wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Andrew Fink says: As much as we dislike the result, we should respect that it is a product of the democratic process we commit to. The democratic process includes results we disagree with.&#8221;</p>
<p>Hi Andrew,</p>
<p>Under most circumstances, I would agree with you. A &#8220;majority wins&#8221; approach, on the whole, promotes freedom. However, the democratic process is inappropriate when it is used to restrict the freedoms of a specific group of people. Think of it this way- would you support putting the freedoms of ethnic and racial minorities up to a popular vote? Would you be comfortable with putting the rights of women up to a popular vote? Hypothetically, what if the majority voted in favor of oppressing those groups or others? Our 5th principle is meant to promote freedom, not restrict it. </p>
<p>Taking away the rights of a specific group of people (including through a popular vote) solely based on their identity runs counter to our 1st, 2nd, and 6th principles. At its heart, our faith seeks justice and freedom for everyone. Putting the rights of minorities, including LGBT people, up to a popular vote is always wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Southworth</title>
		<link>http://www.standingonthesideoflove.org/blog/standing-on-the-side-of-love-with-a-broken-heart/comment-page-1/#comment-354</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Southworth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 14:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.standingonthesideoflove.org/?p=1854#comment-354</guid>
		<description>Meg, Thanks as always, for your words and for your leadership.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meg, Thanks as always, for your words and for your leadership.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Claire Deroche</title>
		<link>http://www.standingonthesideoflove.org/blog/standing-on-the-side-of-love-with-a-broken-heart/comment-page-1/#comment-352</link>
		<dc:creator>Claire Deroche</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 17:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.standingonthesideoflove.org/?p=1854#comment-352</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Meg, for your wise words. I do believe that it is the next generation who will right this injustice---if we of this generation keep building the foundation!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Meg, for your wise words. I do believe that it is the next generation who will right this injustice&#8212;if we of this generation keep building the foundation!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Fink</title>
		<link>http://www.standingonthesideoflove.org/blog/standing-on-the-side-of-love-with-a-broken-heart/comment-page-1/#comment-351</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Fink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 16:25:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.standingonthesideoflove.org/?p=1854#comment-351</guid>
		<description>Our fifth principle:  The right of conscience and the use of the democratic process within our congregations and society at large.

As much as we dislike the result, we should respect that it is a product of the democratic process we commit to.

The democratic process includes results we disagree with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our fifth principle:  The right of conscience and the use of the democratic process within our congregations and society at large.</p>
<p>As much as we dislike the result, we should respect that it is a product of the democratic process we commit to.</p>
<p>The democratic process includes results we disagree with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rev. Debra Haffner</title>
		<link>http://www.standingonthesideoflove.org/blog/standing-on-the-side-of-love-with-a-broken-heart/comment-page-1/#comment-349</link>
		<dc:creator>Rev. Debra Haffner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 15:11:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.standingonthesideoflove.org/?p=1854#comment-349</guid>
		<description>It is morally unjust that the private moral decisions of women and same sex couples should be subject to majority votes or political trading.  See my blog today at www.religiousinstitute.org</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is morally unjust that the private moral decisions of women and same sex couples should be subject to majority votes or political trading.  See my blog today at <a href="http://www.religiousinstitute.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.religiousinstitute.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynne Marie Wanamaker</title>
		<link>http://www.standingonthesideoflove.org/blog/standing-on-the-side-of-love-with-a-broken-heart/comment-page-1/#comment-343</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynne Marie Wanamaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 01:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.standingonthesideoflove.org/?p=1854#comment-343</guid>
		<description>I am proud to be a Unitarian Universalist.  My faith tradition buoys me in such dark times. 

I had the priviledge of preaching on the topic of love, including my reflections on gay marriage, at my UU house of worship in June.  There&#039;s a link to that sermon here: 
http://www.mindbodymama.com/2009/11/mind-body-mama-never-give-up.html

I blogged about my personal reflections on our defeat in Maine here: 
http://www.mindbodymama.com/2009/11/mind-body-mama-more-on-maine.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am proud to be a Unitarian Universalist.  My faith tradition buoys me in such dark times. </p>
<p>I had the priviledge of preaching on the topic of love, including my reflections on gay marriage, at my UU house of worship in June.  There&#8217;s a link to that sermon here:<br />
<a href="http://www.mindbodymama.com/2009/11/mind-body-mama-never-give-up.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.mindbodymama.com/2009/11/mind-body-mama-never-give-up.html</a></p>
<p>I blogged about my personal reflections on our defeat in Maine here:<br />
<a href="http://www.mindbodymama.com/2009/11/mind-body-mama-more-on-maine.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.mindbodymama.com/2009/11/mind-body-mama-more-on-maine.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: beth graham</title>
		<link>http://www.standingonthesideoflove.org/blog/standing-on-the-side-of-love-with-a-broken-heart/comment-page-1/#comment-342</link>
		<dc:creator>beth graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 22:39:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.standingonthesideoflove.org/?p=1854#comment-342</guid>
		<description>As is so often the case, Meg, your words are both eloquent and so darn down-to-earth.

Thanks for speaking the words so many of us have been feeling oday.  

Beth</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As is so often the case, Meg, your words are both eloquent and so darn down-to-earth.</p>
<p>Thanks for speaking the words so many of us have been feeling oday.  </p>
<p>Beth</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
