Posts Tagged ‘nondiscrimination’

“Our work as a Welcoming Congregation doesn’t stop at our doors.”

1 Comment | Share On Facebook| “Our work as a Welcoming Congregation doesn’t stop at our doors.” Share/Save/Bookmark Jan 02, 2013

Members of Emerson Unitarian Universalist Chapel in Ellisville, Missouri, recently had an opportunity to live our mission as a “Welcoming Congregation” in the wider community by standing on the side of love during a local nondiscrimination vote. Emerson is a small congregation of about 120 members and one of two UU congregations in St. Louis County. Emerson’s members voted unanimously in May 2011 to apply for Welcoming Congregation status, and the application had been completed and approved by the beginning of last year.

Rev. Krista Taves of Emerson UU Chapel is interviewed after the vote. (Credit: Philip Deitch)

On Tuesday evening, November 27, 2012, the St. Louis County Council planned to vote on Bill 279, which would remedy the exclusion of sexual orientation and gender identity from nondiscrimination protections in employment, housing, and public accommodations. No changes were to be made by the bill other than adding those two groups to those already protected from discrimination. The changes would affect the unincorporated sections of the county, which are home to approximately one-third of the county’s population. The rest of the county’s almost one million residents live in the 90 municipalities in the county, a growing number of which (in addition to the independent City of St. Louis) have already added these protections for LGBTQ citizens. It was clear that the vote would be close. It was also clear that some very vocal opposition planned to come to the Council chambers to speak against Bill 279.

PROMO, Missouri’s LGBTQ advocacy organization, contacted Emerson through our Welcoming Congregation committee–the Diversity Alliance–and asked for help. The LGBTQ community needed people to speak in support of the bill and thank the Council for its work to promote justice and equality for all country residents. Emerson Chapel has a long and cooperative history with PROMO, and we were grateful for this chance to witness to our values. In all, eight members and friends of Emerson Chapel attended the meeting.

The bill obviously excited people’s passions, as 92 people registered to speak in the packed Council chambers. The Council was only obligated to listen to half an hour of testimony, but showed great commitment to letting every voice be heard. Speakers were limited to one minute each. Some did waive their right to speak in the interests of time, but most did not. In the end, the council heard almost two hours of testimony.

Most of those who spoke were vehemently opposed to the bill, many citing religious reasons, and some using language that one Council member described as “intolerance” and “bigotry.” Words like “perverts,” “deviants,” and “bestiality” were thrown around by the bill’s opponents. Scripture was quoted, and more than one person threatened the Council with hellfire and damnation. Many of the bill’s opponents were from Concerned Women for America, a group with the goal of bringing Biblical principles into all levels of public policy. Some other very conservative groups were disproportionately represented as well, including many from the NRA who had latched onto some language in the bill about guns (though that section had already been on the books for approximately 20 years).

PROMO’s Andrew Shaughnessy and Bill 279 sponsor Pat Dolan give a victorious thumbs-up. (Credit: Philip Deitch)

Thankfully, a much smaller, but equally passionate group spoke in support of the bill, including (but not limited to) two people associated with the Ethical Society, a couple of people from local Jewish organizations, and at least two who identified themselves as Christians, as well as three people from the Emerson contingent, including our minister Rev. Krista Taves, one of our young adults, and the current coordinator of our Diversity Alliance. Emerson also worked with Missourians for Equality to live-stream the entire meeting, and many other Emersonians watched along, or followed our Facebook updates posted from the Council chambers as we listened to the angry, frightened, hateful language with our hearts racing.

It was an extremely toxic and difficult two hours, but it was all worth it when the Council decided by a vote of 4 to 3 to pass the bill. This was a big victory for LGBTQ equality in our region, and we will continue to work with PROMO as more of the remaining municipalities in the county consider these same protections for LGBTQ residents. We were honored to participate in this historic event. Our work as a Welcoming Congregation doesn’t stop at our doors.


This post was written by Emerson UU Chapel member Lauren Lyerla, who testified at the County Council hearing. Find out more about the Unitarian Universalist Association’s “Welcoming Congregation” program here. Is your congregation already certified? Learn how to deepen your welcome here.

Walmart Confirms Expansion of Non-Discrimination Policy, UUA Pushes for Gender Identity Addition

1 Comment | Share On Facebook| Walmart Confirms Expansion of Non-Discrimination Policy, UUA Pushes for Gender Identity Addition Share/Save/Bookmark Nov 18, 2011
timbrennan

Tim Brennan

glennfarley

Glenn C. Farley

Post by Tim Brennan, treasurer of the Unitarian Universalist Association (UUA), and Glenn C. Farley, co-chair of the UUA Committee on Socially Responsible Investing.

——————————————————————————————————————–

In each of the past five years, the Unitarian Universalist Association has filed a shareholder resolution asking Walmart to add Gender Identity or Expression to its non-discrimination policy.  Last week we were notified by Walmart’s Office of Diversity that they were adopting this policy and were disseminating it throughout their network of stores and distribution centers.  This is a big step towards justice for Walmart employees and perhaps even more importantly, an example to other companies. Walmart is currently the largest company in the Fortune 500 and the largest employer in the nation and, for that matter, the world.  So how Walmart operates can profoundly affect corporate policies and practices worldwide, for better or for worse.

Federal law does not prohibit discrimination based on gender identity or expression, and state laws vary widely.  Therefore, protections by employers are extremely important.  While more companies each year add gender identity or expression as a protected class, most companies are still lagging.  According to the Human Rights Campaign, in 2010 69% of the Fortune 100 and 46% of the Fortune 500 had non-discrimination policies that include gender identity or expression. This is up from 11% and 5% respectively in 2003.  Fully 39% of the Fortune 500 offer transgender-inclusive health insurance benefits, up from 1% in 2004.  We hope that the Walmart example will spur additional companies to become more inclusive.

Other companies have changed as well.  The UUA’s resolutions asking for non-discrimination polices on gender identity or expression resulted in policy change at Lowes, Home Depot, Travelers Insurance, and Dr Pepper Snapple Group.  Verizon, ExxonMobil and ConocoPhillips have so far refused, but our campaign continues.

This is one small, but significant step for Walmart.  Yet the company still has a long way to go to improve its treatment of employees.  Just recently it was announced that the company’s health plan would become more expensive and less widely available.  Advocates both within and outside of the company must continue to push for improvement.

The UUA’s shareholder advocacy program is just one expression of the Standing on the Side of Love campaign – our vision is of a world in which no one is dehumanized through acts of exclusion, oppression, or violence because of their identities.

We know that lasting change only happens in coalition and collaboration. In our broad shareholder advocacy work towards inclusion, anti-oppression and non-violence, we will continue to do our part to bend the arc of the moral universe towards justice.

On November 20, we encourage you to stand on the side of love as we observe the International Transgender Day of Remembrance (TDOR), honoring and remembering those murdered through hate and ignorance.

A Progressive Wal-Mart: Too Good to be True?

No Comments | Share On Facebook| A Progressive Wal-Mart: Too Good to be True? Share/Save/Bookmark Oct 13, 2011
Crop-GA

Daryl Bridges is the Director/Lead Organizer at the Massachusetts Committee for Interfaith Worker Justice.

Recently Wal-Mart has been trumpeting their transgender non-discrimination statement and I agree it is a lovely gesture; however, I fear this is nothing more than an “on paper” change. Wal-Mart has a well documented history of categorically discriminating against women, minorities, and people of non-heteronomative sexual orientations/identities. Wal-Mart takes great care to create a shield from liability by instituting corporate policy that forbids these actions and promise equal pay, equal opportunity for advancement, and equal voice. Instead they enforce discrimination by practice selectively promoting and giving undesirable shifts to those they do not want to see climb the corporate ladder. Most recently Wal-Mart has seen the triumph of these tactics when the courts ruled that a class-action lawsuit alleging gender discrimination could not proceed with one of the main cited reasons being that Wal-Mart has a corporate policy against gender discrimination.

This is part of Wal-Mart’s general tactic of playing to the progressive crowd. They have made large strides in public appearance by fabricating popular policies that have no teeth, by trumpeting their green policies, and by spreading charitable donations broadly to progressive non-profits. For Wal-Mart the cost of creating a feel-good policy that looks positive is almost nothing but the dividends of this false goodwill is massive. Wal-Mart is happy to claim that they are standing on the side of an inclusive, corporate environment but their behavior contradicts their words.

Wal-Mart cannot be trusted to police itself and any discussion about their practices should be met with a call to accountability. Wal-Mart has not changed. They still fire workers for talking about unions. They still discriminate against women and minorities. They still destroy ten jobs for every three they make. They still create and maintain sweatshops and they still pay huge sums into governments that murder and imprison transgendered persons. Wal-Mart has learned to talk the talk but they have not yet chosen to Stand on the Side of Love.

If Wal-Mart is going to change, we most hold them accountable to the policies they make and we must join with our community allies to do so. Please reach out to your local GBLT community and help them ensure that this policy becomes more than a paper-tiger. Wal-Mart can change but only if we make them.